Autodesk
ADD A NEW IDEA

Clear

Ideas

    Showing 8

    Increase RTC Comment Length and Configuration

    Currently RTC Comments are limited to 69 characters and only appear within a single box that you need to scroll horizontally to read. Please allow comments to be much larger and have multi-line format so we can add useful comments and explanations...
    Dave White over 1 year ago in InfoWorks ICM / RTC 1 Under consideration

    RTC Naming

    Allow longer names for RTC definitions (Rules, Logic, Variables, etc.). Current limitation of 10 characters for a name is debilitating for more complex logic trees (especially in Global) and does not permit easily named element descriptors.
    Dave White over 1 year ago in InfoWorks ICM / RTC 1 Under consideration

    Pipe names missing in export from Civil3D

    When exporting pipes from Civil3D to Infodrainage, the pipe names keep reverting to the autogenerated names given when pipe is created in Civil3D even though they were renamed in Civil3D.
    Jenna Woyner about 2 years ago in InfoDrainage / Civil3D Integration 1 Under consideration

    Include parts mapping files for the UKIE country kit by default.

    Across the UKIE region many designers will use the UKIE country kit for building Civil3D models, instead of everyone making their own parts map files this could be an integral part of the data exchange between two Autodesk products, included in th...
    Guest about 2 years ago in InfoDrainage / Civil3D Integration 1 Under consideration

    Add an option to 'apply rainfall' directly to river reach objects

    Currently a user would need to define a subcatchment to generate runoff for a river reach. This is okay for 1D models but for 1D/2D models, especially 2d runoff models it adds some additional steps for the user. It would be nice for add a 'apply r...
    Alex Grist 11 months ago in InfoWorks ICM / River Modeling 2 Under consideration

    Better Interoperability options

    The InfoDrainage import tool in Civil 3D forces all model elements (Pipe Networks and SWC Surfaces/Featurelines/Corridors) into a single active drawing. This conflicts with standard Civil 3D workflows where Utility and Grading designs are maintain...
    Guest 4 months ago in InfoDrainage / Civil3D Integration 1 Under consideration

    Ruby Storage Area fix

    When trying to check if a storage area contains a node, Ruby shows the error message that the storage area object is not a polygon, although the methods show that a storage area has a method 'contains'. The workaround is now to create a temporary ...
    Marcel Glasbergen over 1 year ago in InfoWorks ICM / Ponds/Storage 1 Under consideration

    Results tool tips for 2D Zone

    Interactive tooltip appear to be missing 2D Zone element results...
    Guest over 1 year ago in InfoWorks ICM / 2D Flooding 1 Under consideration

    Disclaimer: The development, release, and timing of any features or functionality described or discussed for our products in this User Feedback Forum for Autodesk Water Products and Services remains at our sole discretion. This User Feedback Forum for Autodesk Water Products and Services is not a commitment, promise, or legal obligation to deliver any functionality, is intended solely to outline and gather feedback about our general product direction, and should not be relied on in making purchasing decisions.

    Privacy | Cookie preferences