Suggest maintaining some numbering scheme of clip meshing so if one proposal is regrading, we can perform a mesh zone comparison without resorting to a giant waste of time exporting to GIS to figure out the difference as each mesh element number gets scrambled to a different location making the comparison a kalidescope...
I thought CLIP meshing helped this...
Disclaimer: The development, release, and timing of any features or functionality described or discussed for our products in this User Feedback Forum for Autodesk Water Products and Services remains at our sole discretion. This User Feedback Forum for Autodesk Water Products and Services is not a commitment, promise, or legal obligation to deliver any functionality, is intended solely to outline and gather feedback about our general product direction, and should not be relied on in making purchasing decisions.
Thank you for the suggestion and thanks to those who voted.
We will engage in consultations with a wider array of stakeholders to gauge their interest and gather additional perspectives on the proposed feature.
Should we observe a substantial level of enthusiasm and demand, we will be inclined to advance the status of this suggestion to "Under Consideration." This stage will involve a more detailed analysis, including a feasibility study, resource allocation assessment, and preliminary planning to understand how this feature could be seamlessly integrated into the software.