Allow CCTV Inspections to be associated to a pipe/culvert when PLR and asset IDs match but no manhole IDs are provided in the CCTV inspection

Allow inspections to be imported WITHOUT (i.e. missing) manhole IDs but still provide the association to the asset via the PLR if a corresponding pipe asset has the same asset ID.

In the situation where there are no manhole IDs provided then I360A should provide a validation ERROR validation message because the PACP standard mandates manhole ids.

If the Inspection contains incorrectly labelled manhole Ids but the PLR matches the pipe asset ID, then the inspection should be imported and associated to the relevant pipe via/using the CCTV PLR and Pipe's asset ID. In this circumstance there should be a WARNING validation message on the CCTV to indicate that according to the corresponding pipe, the manhole IDs are incorrectly labelled.

Furthermore, there should be a mechanism in both cases that allows a user to approve the inspection because the CCTV inspection PLR ID matches the corresponding pipe asset ID.