|
|
When manholes do not have an asset ID it would be ideal to have Info360 Asset give a temporary asset ID so that the manhole can be imported and the inspection can be visualized in the map. Ideally, the user should be able to update the manhole ID once that has been established in the original GIS.
I think the better solution is to allow inspections to be imported WITHOUT (i.e. missing) manhole IDs but still provide the association to the asset via the PLR if a corresponding pipe asset has the same asset ID.
In the situation where there are no manhole IDs provided then I360A should provide a validation ERROR validation message because the PACP standard mandates manhole ids.
If the Inspection contains incorrectly labelled manhole Ids but the PLR matches the pipe asset ID, then the inspection should be imported and associated to the relevant pipe via/using the CCTV PLR and Pipe's asset ID. In this circumstance there should be a WARNING validation message on the CCTV to indicate that according to the corresponding pipe, the manhole IDs are incorrectly labelled.
Furthermore, there should be a mechanism in both cases that allows a user to approve the inspection because the CCTV inspection PLR ID matches the corresponding pipe asset ID.