Some users prefer other risk breakdowns.
WSP example: They use the NASSCO breakdown from 1-6. In his logic and based on the 'standard' definition of risk is LoF*CoF which would give the highest risk = 6*6=36. However, Info360 Asset requires their score to be weighed so if the weight of LoF and CoF is 50% each then the highest score they can have is 3*3= 9. If we allow the users to normalize their Total LoF and Total CoF this will allow for more flexibility.
Other users also prefer the 0-100 breakdown. In summary, a more flexible calculation allows for different users to calculate risk the way they prefer at their organization.
Disclaimer: The development, release, and timing of any features or functionality described or discussed for our products in this User Feedback Forum for Autodesk Water Products and Services remains at our sole discretion. This User Feedback Forum for Autodesk Water Products and Services is not a commitment, promise, or legal obligation to deliver any functionality, is intended solely to outline and gather feedback about our general product direction, and should not be relied on in making purchasing decisions.