|
|
Some users prefer other risk breakdowns.
WSP example: They use the NASSCO breakdown from 1-6. In his logic and based on the 'standard' definition of risk is LoF*CoF which would give the highest risk = 6*6=36. However, Info360 Asset requires their score to be weighed so if the weight of LoF and CoF is 50% each then the highest score they can have is 3*3= 9. If we allow the users to normalize their Total LoF and Total CoF this will allow for more flexibility.
Other users also prefer the 0-100 breakdown. In summary, a more flexible calculation allows for different users to calculate risk the way they prefer at their organization.
