Disclaimer: The development, release, and timing of any features or functionality described or discussed for our products in this User Feedback Forum for Autodesk Water Products and Services remains at our sole discretion. This User Feedback Forum for Autodesk Water Products and Services is not a commitment, promise, or legal obligation to deliver any functionality, is intended solely to outline and gather feedback about our general product direction, and should not be relied on in making purchasing decisions.
Privacy |
Cookie preferences
Thank you for the suggestion and thanks to those who voted and commented due to the high interest from various organisations, I am pleased to announce that we're moving the status of this to "Under Consideration".
In this stage, we will work with the development team to estimate the effort associated with the implementation of this feature request and that will dictate the feasibility, priority, resource allocation and planning.
Agreed Roger. Long overdue. Anything that will help with what can be the long process of verification is worth looking into.
Can agree more Roger. Long Overdue. Also, they need to allow any Graph statistics to be exported, like when you produce graphs using Result > Graph Report Simulation/Location, that statistics can not be exported or copied either.
Fully support this idea. Have spent many an hour manually copying values from the summary table into spreadsheets. Clients often want a summary of this data to show numerical match to the UDG standards. If the data is shown on screen, hopefully it should be a quick fix to export.
This is a good idea. In general, maybe we should make the Ruby Scripts do comparisons to accepted calibration and validation standards. As a guide and not a rule to ICM InfoWorks or ICM SWMM customers.