Agreed. I want to be able to summarize model results onto the asset network so that I can compare capacity issues and condition assesment all in one platform.
Consuming an ICM license (expensive), opening both networks on top of each other, and applying Spatial SQL Queries is helpful but I'd like a better way for the two to exchange data from ICM to IAM.
My understanding is there is currently one way workflow from InfoAsset Manager to ICM/WS Pro but not the opposite. Hydraulic information such as predicted flows, levels (sewer) and capacities for current and future scenarios are key fundamental inputs to asset management functions and renewal program.
