Skip to Main Content
Autodesk
Status For Review
Categories Asset Management
Created by Krzysztof Tchorzewski
Created on Sep 5, 2024

PACP Split Survey observations enhancements

The issue is when the application is asked to split a survey and the survey is a PACP inspection, NASSCO expects a few things to be on the inspection. First, the first code on the inspection should be AMH with remarks (this could be the node that was in the map to break the inspection) and the second code should be MWL and a %. The % can be the same as the last MWL % recorded on the inspection. If there are continuous defects identified on the inspection at the split, the clock positions need to be placed on the "F" continuous equivalent at the end of the first split and the same clock positions need to be added to the "S' continuous equivalent at the start of the next inspection. Lastly, the last defect of each of the split inspections needs to also have the "AMH" code with remarks. The remarks can be the Ending node of the inspection which the software uses to break the inspection. These all show up when a person tries to export the inspections out of Manager and into a software that is bound by NASSCO rules. The other thing that shows up on the NASSCO import is the scores for the inspection does not show up on the Access DB that is created when exporting the survey out of Manager. There is a table created for this, but no data.

  • Attach files